Legal Opinion
State v. LeBlanc
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1996No. CR-95-0217-PRPublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Vice Chief Justice.
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants on a suspended or revoked license (aggravated DUI). See AR.S. §§ 28-692(A)(l), -697(A)(1). At trial, the court gave the following jury instruction:
The crime of aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor includes the less serious crime of driving on a suspended or revoked license. You may find the defendant guilty of the less serious crime of driving on a suspended or revoked license only if you find unanimously that the State has failed to prove the more serious…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Andrew TsanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- State v. PortilloArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Cecil Lovell JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Iowa v. Kevin Deshay AmbroseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Green v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- STATE of Tennessee v. Phedrek T. DAVISTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.