Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 28, 2024No. 5:23-cv-03785Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MICHAEL PHILLIPS, et al., individually Case No. 23-cv-03785-EJD and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND 11 COBHAM ADVANCED ELECTRONIC 12 SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 36 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiffs Michael Phillips, Brenda Paclik, and Crystal Franklin (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 16 bring this putative class action against CAES Systems LLC (“CAES”); Cobham Advanced 17…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API