Starks v. City of Waukegan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
FEINERMAN, District Judge.
Bennie -Starks spent .twenty years in prison for a 1986 rape and assault that he says he did not- commit.- In this suit-Starks alleges that Waukegan police officers William Biáng, David Deprez, and *1040Miguel Juarez (collectively, with the City of Waukegan, “Waukegan Defendants”), dentists Russell Schneider and Carl Hag-strom (together, “Dentist Defendants”), and forensic serologist Sharon Thomas-Boyd conspired to and did violate his federal due process rights in connection with his criminal prosecution, and that they conspired to and did…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Lindsey v. OrlandoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Brock v. City Of Chicago Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Cheatham v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Gallagher v. GentileDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.