Legal Opinion

Starks v. City of Waukegan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 24, 2015No. 09 C 348PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

FEINERMAN, District Judge.

Bennie -Starks spent .twenty years in prison for a 1986 rape and assault that he says he did not- commit.- In this suit-Starks alleges that Waukegan police officers William Biáng, David Deprez, and *1040Miguel Juarez (collectively, with the City of Waukegan, “Waukegan Defendants”), dentists Russell Schneider and Carl Hag-strom (together, “Dentist Defendants”), and forensic serologist Sharon Thomas-Boyd conspired to and did violate his federal due process rights in connection with his criminal prosecution, and that they conspired to and did…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Lindsey v. OrlandoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Brock v. City Of Chicago Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Cheatham v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Gallagher v. GentileDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API