Clark v. Bohn Ford, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING FIRESTONE’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, District Judge.
This entry addresses summary judgment motions filed by Defendant Bridge-stone/Firestone American Tire, LLC (“Firestone”) in two of the personal injury cases pending in this Multidistrict Litigation. Firestone asserts, as the basis for these motions, that Plaintiffs cannot maintain their causes of action because the tires at issue were discarded. Because the facts in the two cases are similar and because both cases are governed by the same summary judgment standard and by the tort law of Louisiana, we analyze the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- John M. Shank, Jr., and Access International Markets, Ltd. v. William R. Hague, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Susman v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019