Friedman v. Snare & Triest Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, J.
The defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, recovered a verdict and judgment for the damages that accrued to him through personal injuries sustained by his daughter, Fannie Friedman, a child between four and five years of age, by reason, as alleged, of the negligence of the defendant. Reversal is prayed because of alleged trial errors, evidenced by bills of exception.
The declaration sets up that a firm of Colgate & Company were proprietors and operators of a building and premises situate on the south side of York street, in Jersey Oityr,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turess v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Danbeck v. New Jersey Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- State v. Mayor of VinelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
3Cited by20 opinions
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Snare & Triest Co. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- L-M-S Inc. v. BlackwellTexas Supreme Court · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.