McCloskey v. North Penn Bank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 388, Jan. T., 1921, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1919, No. 4128, making absolute rule on the Banking Commissioner to pay over moneys, in case of M. H. McCloskey, Jr., Inc., W. Lewis McGee, Receiver, v. North Penn Bank, John S. Fisher in possession thereof, to use Phoenix Trust Co. Rule on banking commissioner to pay over moneys.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 388, Jan. T., 1921, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1919, No. 4128, making absolute rule on the Banking Commissioner to pay over moneys, in case of M. H. McCloskey, Jr., Inc., W. Lewis McGee, Receiver, v. North Penn Bank, John S. Fisher in possession thereof, to use Phoenix Trust Co. Rule on banking commissioner to pay over moneys. Ferguson, J., filed an opinion as -follows: “M. H. McCloskey, Jr., Inc., a. corporation organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, was a depositor in the North Penn Bank. At the time the hank was closed and its…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the court below; see also,Union National Bank v. Iron Co., 3 Sadler 58; Lancaster County National Bank v. Huver, 114 Pa. 216, where, at page 219 of the latter, the distinction between decisions in which the rights of third parties have intervened and those concerning the rights of the original parties; is recognized; and, as bearing on the general question here involved: Dougherty v. Bank, 93 Pa. 227, and Warner v. Hare, 154 Pa. 548.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dougherty Bros. & Co. v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Lancaster County National Bank v. HuverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Warner v. HareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Union National Bank v. Cannonsburgh Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. South Hills Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939