Warner v. Hare
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 253, Oct. T., 1892, by plaintiff, Henry Warner, assignee in trust for benefit of creditors of Penn Bank, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1884, No. 170, on bill in equity against Thomas Hare et al., directors of Penn Bank. Bill for account. [See former writ, 2 Cent. R. 44.] From the record it appeared that defendants claimed credit for the amount of four notes which they had paid to the Ger-mania Savings Bank. The case was referred to Geo.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 253, Oct. T., 1892, by plaintiff, Henry Warner, assignee in trust for benefit of creditors of Penn Bank, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1884, No. 170, on bill in equity against Thomas Hare et al., directors of Penn Bank. Bill for account. [See former writ, 2 Cent. R. 44.] From the record it appeared that defendants claimed credit for the amount of four notes which they had paid to the Ger-mania Savings Bank. The case was referred to Geo. B. Hamilton, Esq., as master, who reportéd the facts as follows: “ The claim of credit for the payment of four notes to the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
All of the material specifications of error are to the findings of fact by the master. We are not convinced that the learned master has committed any substantial error in this respect, or that he has found any fact without evidence, or without sufficient evidence to submit to a jury.
The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Scranton v. Scranton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- McCloskey v. North Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Penn Bank's Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895