Legal Opinion

Cywinski v. Binney

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 11, 1980No. Civ. B-80-0062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLAIR, District Judge.

Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Army since 1974, seeks to secure her release from service, through a writ of habeas corpus. Her claim is based upon the allegedly improper denial of conscientious objector status. She has exhausted the remedies available to her within the Army and now invokes this court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. No hearing is necessary, as the questions before the court present issues of law. 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Local Rule 6. The petitioner asserts (1) that the Army failed to follow its own regulations in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. KANAI v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API