Legal Opinion

Geis v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City. (Enxiott, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtErnes., J.

An ordinance of the Major and City Council of Balti1 inore, being section 29 of Article 8 of the City Code of 1898,. provides that: “All hackney coaches, buggies, cabs and gigs, kept for hire, and all wagons, furniture carriages, carts, drays, package carts, boats (other than open row boats, of every description) and scows, owned or commonly used or employed in the city, shall be numbered with plain, conspicuous figures, on plates of tin, to be provided as hereinafter directed, * * * and the owner or owners of such carriages, boats or scows, shall annually appear at the office of’ the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  2. Bramble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API