Legal Opinion
Carr v. Norstok Building Systems, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided March 23, 1989No. 09-87-168 CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
An appeal involving the disputed performance and completion of a building contract. The original plaintiff Norstok Building Systems, Inc. (also spelled Norstock), was the prime contractor. Norstok sued Jim Carr d/b/a Jim Carr Motors (Carr) as owner basically for breach of contract in that Norstok alleged that Carr had failed to pay the balance due on the building construction contract. Norstok pleaded that the balance due was $29,597.49 together with legal interest and in addition, a reasonable attorney’s fees of not less than $5,000.00.
Carr by an amended pleading…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Vance v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas National Bank v. KarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moody v. EMC Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Balfour Beatty Rail, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Limestone Group, Inc. v. Sai Thong, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Nikole, Inc. v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.