Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Short v. Spring Creek Ranch, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1987No. 85-241Published

1Concurrence

URBIGKIT, Justice,

specially concurring, with whom MACY, Justice, joins.

For years in Wyoming, without required count, the state bar, trial bench, and law school faculty classified this state as an evidence-of-negligence jurisdiction for application of statutory-violation rules for jury instruction. But then came Distad v. Cubin, Wyo., 633 P.2d 167 (1981).

One is almost led to conclude that sometimes architectural proclivities overwhelm adjudicatory necessities.

It was my opinion then, which remains unchanged, that Distad says everything and means nothing, or says nothing definable and means…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. England v. SimmonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API