Legal Opinion

Spaulding, Julie v. Tri-State Adjustments, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 3, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00377Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JULIE SPAULDING, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 18-cv-377-wmc TRI-STATE ADJUSTMENTS, INC., Defendant. BRYANT SPAULDING, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 18-cv-826-wmc TRI-STATE ADJUSTMENTS, INC., Defendant. In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs Julie Spaulding and her husband Bryant Spaulding each allege violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq., by defendant Tri-State Adjustments, Inc. In turn, Tri-State counterclaimed, alleging abuse of process by both Julie and Bryant.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Paul S. Hammel, Cross-Appellee v. Eau Galle Cheese FactoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API