Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Speck v. Moseley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cueiaii.

Assuming the information to have been duly filed by leave of the court, wdiich the printed book does not show, it challenges the right of respondent, Moseley, to hold the office of patrolman in the paid police department of the borough of Fairview, on the ground that when appointed he was over the age of thirty-five years. There is a general demurrer.

The attack is obviously founded on a series of statutes purporting to be amendments of section 2 of “An act respecting municipal police departments * * *,” approved April 23 st, 1915. Pamph. L., p. 688. See Pamph. L. 1926, p. 600;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, ex rel. Mulsoff v. SloatSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Wentzell v. SteelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API