Wentzell v. Steelman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cukiam.
Without going into details as to the facts these two proceedings present but one common point of contest, and that is, on the merits, was William A. Wentzell qualified for and eligible to appointment as a member of the police force of Somers Point on April 9th, 1926, he then being admittedly of the age of forty-four years. It is insisted that he was not because under Pamph. L. 1926, ch. 324, p. 600, approved March 31st, 1926, nine days earlier, it is provided that no *504person shall be appointed who is under twenty-one years or over thirty-five years of age at the time of his…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- State ex rel. Speck v. MoseleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931