Legal Opinion

Cote v. Landau

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

Appellant sued to recover possession of certain premises in Granite City and the verdict and judgment were in favor of appellee. It was stipulated in the lease that, upon a default in the payment of rent for 15 days after it was due, appellant might at his election re-enter and repossess the premises, and appellee expressly waived any demand for rent and for possession, as well as notice of appellant’s election to declare the lease at an end. The rent was due on the first day of each month. For a time it was not paid promptly, and on December 19, 1923, appellee was notified in writing that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rubens v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lindeke v. Associates Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Espen v. HinchliffeIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Morrison v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lipkin v. BurnstineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Joiner v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Avdich v. KleinertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API