Legal Opinion

Bigham v. Dover

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 25, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polk 'Circuit Court; James S. St^l, Judge; statement by the court. Appellee bought a saddle for $12 at a sale under the following execution: “County of Pope, Township of White.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Polk 'Circuit Court; James S. St^l, Judge; statement by the court. Appellee bought a saddle for $12 at a sale under the following execution: “County of Pope, Township of White. “The State of Arkansas to any constable of Polk County: You are hereby commanded that of the goods and chattels of E. T. Bigham you cause to be made the sum of nine dollars ($9) which W. W. Cranford late before me, a justice of the peace for said county, recovered against him for his costs in a replevin suit, and also costs in a suit wherein S. S. Crockett was plaintiff and W. W. Cranford and E. T. Bigham…

1Opinion of the Court

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) Our statute provides that: “An execution may issue upon any final judgment, order or decree of a court of record for a liquidated sum of money, and for interest artd costs, or for costs alone.” Section 3203, Kirby’s Digest.

There is no law or rule of practice that authorizes a single execution for the amounts of two separate and distinct judgments. 17 Cyc. 932. A joint execution upon two separate judgments is not voidable merely, but void. Merchie v. Gaines, 5 B. Monroe (Ky.), 126; Doe v. Rue, 4 Blackf. Ind. 263. Such an execution is defective, not in form…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Otis Bros. & Co. v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hall v. DoyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  4. Jett v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Hightower v. Handlin & VenneysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CTC Inv. Co. v. Daniel Boone Coal CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1931
  2. Keaton v. ShiflettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Dugan v. HarmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Dugan v. HarmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API