Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Medox, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1981No. 79-433Published

1Dissent

PRYOR, Associate Judge,

with whom NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and MACK, Associate Judge, join, dissenting:

This case involves perplexing questions raised by “other insurance” clauses in separate insurance policies which insure the same risk. Appellees argue, and the majority accepts, the premise that construing the respective clauses in a manner which would require both companies to share the coverage of the loss which they insured, overrides the contractual intent of the parties and places the court in the role of the legislature.

A closer look at this area of insurance coverage reveals a myriad of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Firemen's Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API