Bierce v. State Nat. Bank of Memphis, Tenn.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; B. F. Burwell, Judge. Action by the State National Bank of Memphis, Tennessee, against W. W. Bierce. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This action was begun in the district court of Oklahoma county by tbe defendant in error, as plaintiff, on tbe 2d day of April, 1906, filing its petition, in which it asked judgment upon a certain promissory note given by plaintiff in error, W. W. Bierce, to James K. Porter, in the sum of $4,333.34, on March 2, 1901, at Memphis, Tenn., and due 5 years after date. The said note, prior to maturity and for value, was indorsed by the said Porter to the plaintiff, and, the same not having been met at its maturity, this action was brought.
To the petition the defendant filed an answer and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Caliendo v. CataniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Wade v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bierce v. State Nat. Bank of Memphis, Tenn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912