Legal Opinion
Caliendo v. Catania
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The facts in this case appear in the finding of the unemployment compensation commissioner for the third district which is not attacked upon this appeal and may be briefly stated as follows: Prior to May 1, 1937, Felice Catania, the appellant, was the owner of two barber shops in New Haven, one located on Wall Street and the other on York Street, each known as Phil’s Barber Shop, and Catania had previously decided to close the York Street shop. The lease on this shop was to expire in May, 1937, and on May 3d Catania concluded an arrangement with Louis Sacco, who had been employed by him for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merrill v. KenyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Frederick Raff Co. v. GoebenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Bierce v. State Nat. Bank of Memphis, Tenn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. CruteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Klepp Wood Flooring Corporation v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Murphy v. Dell Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cocchiola Paving v. Chase Devel. Group, No. Cv92-0112359 S (Sep. 24, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- New Haven Drywall Co., Inc. v. Burke, No. 313459 (Sep. 1, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994