Legal Opinion

Thomas v. South Haven & Eastern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1904No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Carr, J. Assumpsit by Wesley J. Thomas against the South Haven & Eastern Railroad Company for breach of a contract to construct a side track. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the court below for the nonperformance by defendant of its alleged contract to construct a side track alongside of plaintiff’s warehouse. Plaintiff’s testimony tended to prove that defendant, acting through its general manager, verbally agreed to construct the side track in question if plaintiff would move to a piece of land near its track, owned by him, a large building situated remote therefrom, and repair and remodel the same so as to make it suitable for a warehouse; that he at once removed, repaired, and remodeled the building; and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Sanford v. HuxfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Detroit, Hillsdale & Indiana Railroad v. ForbesMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Stevens v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caplis v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Feiler v. Midway Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API