Legal Opinion

Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 28, 2009No. 08-3183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Each state that accepts federal grants under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act must establish “a system to protect and advocate the rights of individuals with developmental disabilities.” 42 U.S.C. § 15043. A second statute, the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801-51 (PAIMI), provides extra funding for systems established under § 15043. A system that receives money under § 10803 is entitled to investigate “incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness” (§ 10805(a)(1)(A))…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Smith v. Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
  3. Ind. Prot. and Adv. Servs. v. Ind. Family and Soc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Indiana Prot. and Adv. v. Ind. Family Soc. Serv.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API