Legal Opinion

Karson v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2003No. 0004-03416; A117116Published

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

On summary judgment, the trial court ruled, among other things, that plaintiff is not an employee of defendant Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) and that the OLCC has no statutory obligation to negotiate contract terms with him. The trial court entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

The OLCC is responsible for the sale of alcohol in Oregon and is authorized to establish retail liquor stores. ORS 471.725. The OLCC may operate the stores itself or appoint persons known as liquor agents to operate them. ORS 471.750(1). Currently, the OLCC sells alcohol through…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schaff v. Ray's Land & Sea Food Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Roseburg Forest Products v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API