Legal Opinion

Therman McGriff v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1969No. 22936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from a judgment of conviction, resulting from a jury trial on an indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, in that the appellant did “receive, conceal and retain, with intent to convert to his own use and gain, stolen goods and property of the United States, of a value in excess of $100.00. * * * ”.

18 U.S.C. § 641 uses the words “receives, conceals or retains” in the disjunctive. The indictment uses them in the conjunctive. “[I]t is * * * proper to charge conjunctively the elements of a crime which is denounced disjunctively in the statute, and a finding of any one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Turf Center, Inc., Allen, A. Goldberg, Milton Hyatt and Myer Mayor Fox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon FrakesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Bruce Warren Hobson, United States of America v. Morton NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Pasquale Cioffi and Eugene Robert CiuzioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. James Jerome AstolasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Michael E. Pauldino, A/K/A Mike Parker, and Jess Raymond Bridwell, A/K/A Ray BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API