Keepers v. Fleitmann
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This is an action for the conversion of thirty-three knitting machines, admittedly personal property. The presiding judge * directed a verdict for the defendants on the plaintiff’s evidence, and the case is here on an exception to that ruling.
The facts proved by the plaintiff were as follows: The machines were manufactured by the Wildman Manufacturing Company and sold to the Worcester Knitting Mills under a conditional contract of sale at some time before July 1, 1907. This conditional sale was not fully complied with until after the conversion here complained of, but the machines were not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Carpenter v. SnellingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Dame v. C. H. Hanson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Chase v. IngallsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Tatman v. HumphreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hurnanen v. NicksaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Atlantic Transportation Co. v. Alexander Shipping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Federal Trust Co. v. Bristol County Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Rowe Vending Machine Co. v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Zweig v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.