Legal Opinion

Casselman's Administratrix v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtNelly, J.

The declaration in this case avers, and the agreed statement upon which the case was tried stipulates, the following essen*554tial facts: Claude E. Sprenlde being the owner of certain real estate upon which there was an unsatisfied .deed of trust, given by a prior owner, sold and conveyed the same to Emma M. Moran. The latter conveyed-the property to a trustee (subject to the above-mentioned deed of trust) to secure to Sprenlde a part of the purchase money, which was represented by two notes payable to the order of Emma M. Moran and endorsed by her for $350 and $1,300, respectively. The note for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newberry Land Co. v. NewberrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. McIlvane v. Big Stony Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Swain v. Virginia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  4. Elm Co. v. BeaudreauFairfax County Circuit Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API