Nilsen v. . American Bridge Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 19, 1917, which affirmed an, order of Special Term granting a motion by plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings. The following question was certified: “Is the plaintiff, respondent herein, entitled to judgment upon the pleadings ? ” The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHogan, J.
The complaint in this action alleged in substance that defendant is a domestic corporation; that on February 15th, 1916, plaintiff while in the employ of defendant and engaged in work under its direction, without negligence on his part, and by reason of the negligence of defendant, received injury to his person, the nature of which is detailed in the complaint; that by reason of such injuries, which are stated to be permanent, he suffered pain for a long period of time, though he was not incapacitated for more than two weeks from earning full wages at his customary employment. The defendant…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Nulle v. Hardman, Peck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Basso v. John T. Clark & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1919
- Flatau v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Dziengelewsky v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.