Legal Opinion

Cline v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 2007No. 4D06-1166Published

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

We affirm Cline’s conviction of trafficking in cocaine. Cline pled nolo contendere when his motion to dismiss and motion to suppress were denied, reserving his right to appeal the rulings on both motions.

We address objective entrapment due process issues arising out of the involvement of an untested and unmonitored informant, who served as a middleman during a drug transaction and who gave authorities the information leading to Cline’s arrest.

At the motion to suppress hearing, Deputy Chase testified he had previously arrested the informant, Frank Petrone, on cocaine charges. The deputy spoke…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. GlossonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Farley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API