Legal Opinion

Moore County v. . Burns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.

The demurrer must be overruled if the complaint is good as to any one of the demurrants. That is, if any one of defendants is a necessary or proper party as to each tract -of land, the complaint is not subject to attack-by joint demurrer. Winders v. Southerland, 174 N. C., 235, 93 S. E., 726.

The joinder of II. F. Burns as a party defendant is not fatal. He is not a necessary party as to any one of the tracts. His joinder is mere surplusage and is not ground for demurrer by other defendants. Sullivan v. Field, 118 N. C., 358; Abbott v. Hancock, 123 N. C., 99; Shuford v. Yarborough, 197 N. C.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Abbott Ex Rel. Abbott v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brashears v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Shaw v. . BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API