Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1993No. 850 C.D. 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Before us is an appeal by Weyerhaeuser Company (employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal *515Board (board) reversing the referee’s decision and reinstating the benefits of Richard Burns (claimant) pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1

On March 29,1988, claimant sustained an injury to his right foot arising out of and in the course of his employment with employer. A notice of compensation payable was issued on April 21, 1988.2 Claimant returned to work on January 11, 1989.

On February 1, 1989, a supplemental agreement was entered into by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. USX Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Mathies Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API