Legal Opinion

Ricky M. Arntsen v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 31, 2026No. 3:26-cv-05135Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 RICKY M. ARNTSEN, 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:26-cv-05135-JCC-BAT 10 v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Ricky M. Arntsen proceeds pro se in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action. Defendants 14 have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 15 12(c) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or for judgment on the 16 pleadings and, alternatively, based upon qualified immunity. Dkt. 31.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API