Ricky M. Arntsen v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 RICKY M. ARNTSEN, 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:26-cv-05135-JCC-BAT 10 v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Ricky M. Arntsen proceeds pro se in this
42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. Defendants 14 have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 15 12(c) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or for judgment on the 16 pleadings and, alternatively, based upon qualified immunity. Dkt. 31.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.