Legal Opinion
United States v. Navas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 2009No. 08 Cr. 1144(WHP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge.
Defendants Jose Navas (“Navas”), Arturo Morel (“Morel”), and Jose Alvarez (“Alvarez”) move to suppress evidence seized on November 4, 2008, as well as certain post-arrest statements. On February 24, 2009, this Court held an evidentiary hearing. For the following reasons, their motions to suppress are granted in part, and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On August 19, 2008, law enforcement personnel assigned to Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) Task Force T-21, arrested a cooperating witness (the “CW”) at a warehouse in Newark, New Jersey.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EarlsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- United States v. NavasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StegemannDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Cooper v. HutchesonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- John Christopher Reynolds v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014