Legal Opinion

Michael Allen v. Richard Ives

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2020No. 18-35001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL ALLEN, No. 18-35001 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-00044-HZ RICHARD IVES, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed September 22, 2020 Before: William A. Fletcher, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges. Order; Concurrence by Judge W. Fletcher; Dissent by Judge R. Nelson 2 ALLEN V. IVES SUMMARY* Habeas Corpus The panel denied a petition for rehearing en banc and denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc. Concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge W. Fletcher, joined…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. (HC) Best v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. (HC) Capps v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (HC) Capps v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Capps v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Estell v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API