Legal Opinion

In re Moorman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 24, 2017No. 2017-B-0431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

2Per curiam

| iThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, James E. Moorman, III, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension pursuant to a joint motion of the parties filed in October 2013. In re: Moorman, 13-2430 (La. 10/21/13), 128 So.3d 268.

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

By way of background, the misconduct at issue in this proceeding occurred over a three-month period of time in 2013, while respondent was experiencing severe depression. In…

3Cases cited9 opinions

Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

In re MoormanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018