Legal Opinion

Yoo Han & Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 8, 1991No. Docket Nos. 20375-87, 20378-87, 12791-88, 12989-88UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOO HAN & CO., LTD., ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Yoo Han & Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 20375-87, 20378-87, 12791-88, 12989-88

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1991-308; 1991 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 360; 62 T.C.M. (CCH) 83; T.C.M. (RIA) 91308;

July 8, 1991, Filed

An appropriate order and decision will be entered.

John and Woon Young Yoo, pro se.

Bruce Wilpon and Stephen Ianello, for the respondent.

WELLS, Judge.

WELLS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The instant case is before us on respondent's motion for entry of decision which is based upon a settlement reached by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Stamm International Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Cloes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Daniel M. Kelley Nancey N. Kelley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Allan & Gloria Molasky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Johnston, and Thomas E. Johnston, Successor in Interest to Shirley L. Johnston, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Johnston v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API