Legal Opinion

Thomas E. Johnston, and Thomas E. Johnston, Successor in Interest to Shirley L. Johnston, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2006No. 04-73833PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge:

This case presents an attempt at “post-deal negotiation.” It doesn’t usually work in business. Why should we treat the tax collector differently?

Specifically, we address the following question: when a taxpayer offers to pay the Internal Revenue Service a sum certain to “fully resolve all adjustments at issue” for certain tax years, and the Commissioner accepts his offer, may the taxpayer then apply net operating losses (“NOLs”) to reduce his agreed payments under the settlement? Here, the answer is no. The taxpayer did not reserve the right to use NOLs in the settlement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Leo Goldman and Pauline Goldman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Corson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Stamm International Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Cloes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trout v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  2. RealNetworks, Inc. v. DVD Copy Control Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Laszloffy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Vasquez v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  5. David W. Trout v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API