Legal Opinion
Fisher v. City of Tacoma
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 21, 1993No. 15197-9-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Doran, J. *
In this personal injury action, the City of Tacoma moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court denied the City's motion. Pursuant to RAP 2.3, this court granted discretionary review, and we now reverse.
On December 10, 1985, while operating a motor vehicle, William Fisher collided with another vehicle. On July 31, 1986, Fisher filed a complaint for personal injuries against the City of Tacoma, alleging a defective intersection design and a defective signal light were the cause of the accident. A copy of the summons and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Nearing v. Golden State Foods Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Tarabochia v. Town of Gig HarborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Patrick v. DeYoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Stikes Woods Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, AGWashington Supreme Court · 2000