Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. Becton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1991No. 90-5204Published

1DissentHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. In particular, I disagree with the majority’s reasoning in Section III of its opinion. The doctrine of reasonable expectations should be applied in this case, and thus the district court’s summary judgment should be reversed because the homeowners have raised genuine *1292issues of material fact regarding their reasonable expectations.

Whether the rule of honoring reasonable expectations should be applied to policies issued pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a question of first impression for this court. The merits thus deserve more scrutiny than the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API