Legal Opinion
Feinberg v. Boros
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered September 9, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order dismissing the complaint and to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In 1997, plaintiff and his former partner, Norman Katz, submitted to arbitration the issue of the final purchase price of Katz’s share of the jointly owned I. Appel Corporation, thus barring litigation of plaintiffs claims against the corporation’s accounting firm (I. Appel Corp. v Mahoney Cohen & Co., 294 AD2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Am. Ins. Co (Messinger)New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Tenzer v. EllenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kerins v. Prudential Property & CasualtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Deitz v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- State Farm Insurance v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maurice W. Pomfrey & Associates., Ltd. v. Hancock & Estabrook, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Feinberg v. BorosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Feinberg v. BorosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Government Employees Insurance v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009