Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Boros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catterson, J.

At issue on this appeal is whether the defendant members of a law firm committed legal malpractice by not advising the plaintiff, Herbert Feinberg, that an agreement with his former business partner to limit the collateral estoppel effect of an arbitration award would have been enforceable in Feinberg’s lawsuit against a third party. As set forth in greater detail below, precedent, sparse as it is on this issue, nevertheless mandates that such limiting agreements are not carved-out exceptions to normal collateral estoppel principles. We therefore find that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Matter of Am. Ins. Co (Messinger)New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Rembrandt Industries, Inc. v. Hodges International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Bukowski v. Clarkson UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API