Legal Opinion
Harte v. Fraser
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 28, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October. term, 1901.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action to recover for personal injuries, commenced December 18, 1898, against F. S. Hanson. To a declaration therein filed, February 21, 1899, Hanson filed a plea of the general issue, March 8, 1899. October 10,1900, without obtaining leave so to do, the plaintiff filed an amended declaration, beginning as follows:
“ Alexander Fraser, Plaintiff, vs. Daisy Hanson Harte and Edwin B. Harte. Adm’rs of the estate and effects of Franklin S. Hanson, deceased, Defendants.
Amended Declaration.
And now comes the plaintiff, by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goldie v. WernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Union Railway & Transit Co v. ShackletIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Gundlach v. SchottIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First National Bank of Evanston v. SousanesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Krinsky v. Stevens Coal Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Larson v. LybyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Harte v. FraserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
- Hyman v. McVeighIllinois Circuit Court · 1878