Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Hurst

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1931No. 13276PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Boni-iam.

The plaintiff, as guardian ad litem for his infant son, C. H. Andrews, Jr., brought this action in claim and delivery of personal property, to recover the possession of a cow and calf, of the alleged value of $100.00, and damages for the alleged unlawful taking and detention thereof. It is alleged in the complaint that the property was in the possession of Sam Moore, but was the property of the infant plaintiff; that the defendants, who are the sheriff and deputy sheriff of Sumter County, S. C., took the property from Sam Moore…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Norris v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. State v. Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Pickens v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  5. Guilford v. . Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Clover Spinning Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Vollington v. Southern Paving Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Stephens v. HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Tyson v. National Discount Corp.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API