Legal Opinion
In re Hime Y.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The issue on this appeal is whether respondent’s child, Hime, was shown to be a “permanently neglected child” within the meaning of subdivision 7 of section 384-b of the Social Services Law, because respondent failed for a period *285of more than one year following the date the child came into the care of an authorized agency “substantially and continuously or repeatedly to maintain contact with or plan for the future of the child, although physically and financially able to do so, notwithstanding the agency’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re Leon RRNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re Hime Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re Ray A. M.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rorie v. Woodmere AcademyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- In re Sheila G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Jaclyn P.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re M.M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Commitment of Star A.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.