Legal Opinion

Rorie v. Woodmere Academy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*203OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This appeal presents once again the question, considered by us in Incorporated Vil. of Brookville v Paulgene Realty Corp. (11 NY2d 672) whether a summer program run by a private school is to be classified for zoning purposes as a day camp. We conclude that the Woodmere Academy summer program, like that of the Robin Hood Country Day School considered in Paulgene, is a permitted use.

Plaintiffs, neighboring property owners of Woodmere Academy, brought action in May, 1978 to enjoin the academy’s proposed use during the summer of 1978, on the ground that the proposed program…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Incorporated Village of Brookville v. Paulgene Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Incorporated Village of Brookville v. Paulgene Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Rorie v. Woodmere AcademyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Summit School v. NeugentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re Hime Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Inc. Village of Asharoken v. PitassyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Lawrence School v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API