Legal Opinion
Krizman v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1936No. Civ. 10134PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
Claiming to be the surviving widow of Vincent Krizmanieh, commonly called Krizman, on his death petitioner filed with the respondent board a petition to have her claim adjusted. The board made findings against her and ordered that she take nothing. The petitioner applied for a rehearing. The application was denied and she has applied to this court for a writ of review.
The application presents only one question. Was the petitioner the wife of the deceased within the meaning of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act?
The petitioner’s maiden name was Catherine Gwendolyn Helms. She married…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Temescal Rock Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Louden v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Brennfleck v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lopez v. BonnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Marriage of Barbosa-Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993