Legal Opinion
Williams v. Colonial Pipeline Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 5, 1964No. 22622PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
1. The Court of Appeals, assuming without deciding that the testimony was admissible, held that the court did not commit harmful error in excluding it “for the reason that the condemnee presented four other witnesses who testified as to their opinions of the condemnee’s damages and the opinion excluded was within the range of the valuations placed on the property by these four witnesses.”
The Court of Appeals in support of its ruling cited Eberhardt v. Bennett, 163 Ga. 796, 803 (137 SE 64); Southern R. Co. v. Garner, 101 Ga. App. 371 (114 SE2d 211); Turner v. State, 43 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Eberhardt v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- American Cotton College v. Atlanta Newspaper UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Siefferman v. PeppersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Bradley v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983