Legal Opinion
Williams v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 30, 1964No. 40715PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The condemnee assigns error on the overruling of a special ground of his motion for new trial complaining of the exclusion of testimony of a witness. Held:
This court held in its previous opinion, assuming without deciding that the excluded testimony was admissible, that the trial court did not commit harmful error in excluding the opin ion testimony of a lay -witness of the value of the property condemned and the consequential damages to the condemnee’s remaining property, for the reason that the condemnee presented four other witnesses who testified as to their opinions of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Central Georgia Power Co. v. CornwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Georgia Power Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Central Georgia Power Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- GARDEN PARKS, INCORPORATED v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Department of Transportation v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- City of Atlanta v. McLucasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- DeKalb County v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.