Legal Opinion
Flores v. 201 West 103 Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 14, 2017No. 16 Civ. 2233 (KPF)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Nicomedes Flores and Crisofo-ro Campos, on behalf of themselves and *435others- similarly situated, brought this class and collective action against corporate Defendants 201 West 103 Corp., doing business as Buchetta; laño Corp., doing business as Acqua; 886 Amsterdam Avenue Corp., doing business as Arco Café; 994 Columbus Avenue Corp., doing business as Isola; 3143 Broadway Corp,, doing business as Bettolona; 1600 Amsterdam Avenue Corp., doing business as Coccola; 412 Amsterdam Corp., doing business as Bettola…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Goel v. Bunge, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ong v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Aliyeva v. Diamond BracesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Anzovino v. Wingate of Dutchess, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Ballast v. Workforce7 Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Cardenas v. Edita's Bar & Restaurant, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.