Carmouche v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROGER D. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
Defendant Bethlehem Steel moves for summary judgment on the grounds that the suit against it was commenced more than two years following plaintiff’s injury and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations.
*1362 FACTS
Plaintiff was injured on or about July 10, 1975, in his employment while cutting a steel “I” beam into two “T” beams. On July 8, 1977, plaintiff filed his complaint in state court against various steel companies and Does I through V. Defendant Bethlehem was not named.
On September 12, 1977, after the two-year statute of limitations, NRS…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Margaret Marshall v. George J. MulreninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Walko Corporation v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Williams v. Avis Transport of Canada, Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 1972
- Garvey v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Rumberg v. Weber Aircraft Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lutz v. CITY OF YORK, PA.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988