Legal Opinion
Lutz v. CITY OF YORK, PA.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 18, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1100PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, David D. Lutz, has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, challenging the constitutionality of the defendant, City of York’s, Cruising Ordinance. A hearing on the motion was held on August 5, 1988, the parties have submitted briefs and the motion is ready for disposition.
On April 19,1988, the City of York enacted the Cruising Ordinance, prohibiting “unnecessary repetitive driving, also known ... as cruising.” Ordinance No. 6, § 4. Cruising was defined in section 3(a) as follows:
driving a motor vehicle on a street past a traffic control…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Bloomsburg Landlords Ass'n v. Town of BloomsburgDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Kirby v. Loyalsock Township School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Stahl, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County1989