Shlakman v. Board of Higher Education
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
The above-named petitioners, employees of respondent Board of Higher Education, appeared before the Internal Security Subcommittee of the United States Senate and when questioned concerning their then or prior membership in the Communist party refused to answer certain questions, asserting the privilege against self incrimination afforded them under the Fifth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. Thereafter, in the latter part of 1952, respondent, proceeding pursuant to section 903 of the New York City Charter terminated their employment. Petitioners in November, 1952 instituted this article…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Matthews v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Daniman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Summers v. HagenAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Union Bank of Switzerland v. HS Equities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.